Genome and karyotype differences between diploid and tetraploid desert roses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v31.e312810

Keywords:

CMA/DAPI bands, chromocenters, DNA C-value, polyploidy, ribosomal DNA

Abstract

Adenium (Apocynaceae) is a genus that contains succulent species, with sculptural stems and large variations in flower shapes and colors. Most of the world's production chain consists of hybrids, and A. obesum (2n = 22) is the species with the greatest ornamental interest. Adenium arabicum (2n = 44) and A. obesum differ in their morphological characteristics and are found in distinct geographical areas. However, according to botanical nomenclature rules, A. arabicum should be named A. obesum or a variety thereof. Although genetic variation data for desert roses is scarce, it is crucial for the ornamental plant production sector. The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of the genomic diversity among diploid and tetraploid A. obesum varieties through the use of various cytomolecular methods. The karyotypes were composed of meta- and submetacentric chromosomes, and the genome size ranged from 2C = 1.98 pg in diploid samples to 2C = 2.92 pg in tetraploid samples. Chromosome banding revealed similarities between the varieties, with the accumulation of AT-rich regions (DAPI+) bands present in the proximal-interstitial chromosome regions, and a smaller amount of GC-rich regions (CMA+). The DAPI+ and CMA+ regions, along with ribosomal DNA and Gypsy retrotransposons, predominated in the interphase chromocenters. Differences in the morphology, chromosome number, in situ hybridization signals, and the DNA C-value decrease between these two groups of samples reinforces that they are distinct species and not varieties. Such information is important for the genetic improvement of desert roses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASSIS, R.; GONÇALVES, L.S.A.; GUYOT, R.; VANZELA, A.L.L. Abundance of distal repetitive DNA sequences in Capsicum L. (Solanaceae) chromosomes. Genome, v.66, n.10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2022-0083

BAI, C.; ALVERSON, W.S.; FOLLANSBEE, A.; WALLER, D.M. New reports of nuclear DNA content for 407 vascular plant taxa from the United States. Annals of Botany, v.110, n.8, p.1623-1629, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs222

BÁEZ, M.; SOUZA, G.; GUERRA, M. Genome size and cytomolecular diversification in two species of the South African endemic genus Tulbaghia L. (Allioideae, Amaryllidaceae). South African Journal of Botany, v.130, p.407-413, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.01.024

BARRETO, L.M.; ASSIS, R.; VANZELA, A.L.L. Chromosomal and genomic data in Neotropical Dorstenia species (Moraceae) and their relationships with African species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, v.202, n.1, p.76- 92, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boac076

BASIT, A. and LIM, K-B. Systematic approach of polyploidy as an evolutionary genetic and genomic phenomenon in horticultural crops. Plant Science v.348, p.112236, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112236

CINTRA, L.A.; SOUZA, T.B.; PARTEKA, L.M.; BARRETO, L.M.; PEREIRA, L.F.P.; GAETA, M.L.; GUYOT, R.; VANZELA, A.L.L. An 82 bp tandem repeat family typical of 30 non-coding end of Gypsy/TAT LTR retrotransposons is conserved in Coffea spp. pericentromeres. Genome, v.65, n.3, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2021-0045

COLOMBO, R.C.; CRUZ, M.A.; CARVALHO, D.U.; HOSHINO, R.T.; ALVES, G.A.C.; FARIA, R.T. Adenium obesum as a new potted flower: growth management. Ornamental Horticulture, v.24, n.3, p.197-205, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14295/oh.v24i3.1226

DAS, A.B.; MOHANTY, S.; DAS, P. Chromosome number, karyotype, and nuclear DNA content in some Adenium species of the family Apocynaceae. Cytobios, v.98, n.388, p.95-104, 1999.

DIMMITT, M.; EDWARDS, T. Adenium Taxonomy and Nomenclature: Progress Creates More Questions. Cactus and Succulent Journal, v.93, n.4, p.252-266, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2985/015.093.0401

EBRAHIMI, F.; NOHOOJI, M.G.; MIRI, S.M. First karyotype analysis of Nerium oleander populations in Iran. Rostaniha, v.22, n.2, p.186-193, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22092/botany.2021.354571.1246

ENDRESS, M.E.; LIEDE-SCHUMANN, S.; MEVE, U. An updated classification for Apocynaceae. Phytotaxa, v.159, n.3, p.175-194, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.159.3.2

FENG, W.; MICHAELS, S.D. Accessing the inaccessible: The organization, transcription, replication, and repair of heterochromatin in plants. The Annual Review of Genetics, v.49, n.1, p.439-459, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055048

FERREIRA, D.A.T.; PRAÇA-FONTES, M.M.; VIEIRA, A.T.; NUNES, A.C.P.; CLARINDO, W.R. Karyotype and nuclear DNA content variation in Passiflora L. Scientia Horticulturae, v.272, 109532, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109532

FISHBEIN, M.; LIVSHULTZ, T.; STRAUB, S.C.K.; SIMÕES, A.O.; BOUTTE, J.; MCDONNELL, A.; FOOTE, A. Evolution on the backbone: Apocynaceae phylogenomics and new perspectives on growth forms, flowers, and fruits. American Journal of Botany, v.105, n.3, p.495-513, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1067

GUIMARÃES, G.; CARDOSO, L.; OLIVEIRA, H.; SANTOS, C.; DUARTE, P.; SOTTOMAYOR, M. Cytogenetic characterization and genome size of the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. AoBP Plants, v.2012, p.pls002, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/pls002

HASSAN, A.H.; MOKHTAR, M.M.; EL ALLALI, A. Transposable elements: multifunctional players in the plant genome. Frontiers in Plant Science, v.14, p.1330127, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1330127

HASTUTI, D.; SURANTO, S.; SETYONO, P. Variation of morphology, karyotype, and protein band pattern of Adenium (Adenium obesum) varieties. Nusantara Bioscience, v.1, n.2, p.78-83, 2009. https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n010205

HESLOP-HARRISON, J.S.; SCHWARZACHER, T.; LIU, Q. Polyploidy: its consequences and enabling role in plant diversification and evolution. Annals of Botany, v.131, n.1, p.1-10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcac132

LIEHR, T. Molecular cytogenetics in the era of chromosomic and cytogenomic approaches. Frontiers in Genetics, v.12, p.720507, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.720507

MONTENEGRO, C.; ROA, F.; FILHO, W.S.S.; SILVA, A.E.B. Heterochromatic patterns of Citrus revisited: a new look at species origins and karyotype evolution. Tree Genetics & Genomes, v.19, p.36, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-023-01610-0

MUJIB, A., MAMGAIN, J., BANSAL, Y., EJAZ, E. Interspecific genome size (2C DNA) variation in some ornamental and medicinal plants: Is it a phenomenon of partial sequence amplification or loss? In Genome size and genetic homogeneity of regenerated plants, 2023. p. 327-351.

NOVAK, P.; ROBLEDILLO, L.A.; KOBLIZKOVA, A.; VRBOVA, I.; NEUMANN, P.; MACAS, J. TAREAN: a computational tool for identification and characterization of satellite DNA from unassembled short reads. Nucleic Acids Research, v.45, n.12, p.e111, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx257

PELLICER, J.; LEITCH, I. The Plant DNA C-values database (release 7.1). The New Phytologist, v.226, n.2, p.301-305, 2020. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26914539

PRAÇA-FONTES, M.M.; CARVALHO, C.R.; CLARINDO, W.R.; CRUZ, C.D. Revisiting the DNA C-values of the genome size-standards used in plant flow cytometry to choose the ‘‘best primary standards’. Plant Cell Reports v.30, p.1183-1191. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1026-x

RAMAKRISHNAN, M.; SATISH, L.; SHARMA, A.; VINOD, K.K.; EMAMVERDIAN, A.; ZHOU, M.; WEI, Q. Transposable elements in plants: Recent advancements, tools and prospects. Plant Molecular Biology Reports, v.40, p.628-645, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-022-01342-w

SANTOS, V.; SILVA, E.F.; ALMEIDA, C. Genome size and identification of repetitive DNA sequences using low coverage sequencing in Hancornia speciosa Gomes (Apocynaceae: Gentianales). Genetics and Molecular Biology, v.43, n.4, p.e20190175, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0175

SCHENK, J.J.; BECKLUND, L.E.; CAREY, S.J.; FABRE, P.P. What is the “modified” CTAB protocol? Characterizing modifications to the CTAB DNA extraction protocol. Applications in Plant Sciences, v.11, p.e11517, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11517

SOUZA, T.B.; GAETA, M.L.; MARTINS, C.; VANZELA, A.L.L. IGS sequences in Cestrum present AT- and GC-rich conserved domains, with strong regulatory potential for 5S rDNA. Molecular Biology Reports, v.47, p.55-66, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-05104-y

SOUZA, T.B.; PARTEKA, L.M.; KUOB, Y.; NASCIMENTO, T.; SCHUBERT, V.; PEDROSA-HARAND, A.; MARQUES, A.; HOUBEN, A.; VANZELA, A.L.L. . Distinct patterns of satDNA distribution in holocentric chromosomes of spike-sedges (Eleocharis, Cyperaceae). Genome, v. 68, p. 1-13, 2025. https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/gen-2024-0089

TEMSCH, E.M.; KOUTECKÝ, P.; URFUS, T.; ŠMARDA, P.; DOLEŽEL J. Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants. Cytometry, v. 101, p.710-724, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24495

VAN DER LAAN, F.M.; ARENDS, J.C. Cytotaxonomy of the apocynaceae. Genetica, v.68, n.1, p.3-35, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02424563

VIMALA, Y.; LAVANIA, S.; LLAVANIA, U.C. Chromosome change and karyotype differentiation–implications in speciation and plant systematics. Nucleus, v.64, p.33-54, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-020-00343-y

ZONNEVELD, B.J.M.; LEITCH, I.J.; BENNETT, M.D. First nuclear DNA amounts in more than 300 Angiosperms. Annals of Botany, v.96, n.2, p.229-244, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci170

Downloads

Published

2025-05-09

How to Cite

Rosa, T. A. de O., Silva, J. M. da, Valentim, T. S., Assis, R. de, Parteka, L. M., & Vanzela, A. L. L. (2025). Genome and karyotype differences between diploid and tetraploid desert roses. Ornamental Horticulture, 31, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v31.e312810

Issue

Section

Articles